Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The advertiser behind those pesky pop-up ads that appear while visiting the NYTimes.com and other major news sites has settled a dispute over the unauthorized and parasitic practice.
According to Terence Ross, the lead attorney for the publishers, the terms of the settlement are confidential.
The parent companies of The New York Times, USA Today, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post along with the digital arms of Knight Ridder and Conde Nast were among news outlets that sued Gator Corp. last June over its pop-up ads.
U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton in Alexandria, VA granted a preliminary injunction ordering Gator to stop delivering pop-up ads at the sites run by those companies.
The trial was to begin last month but was postponed while settlement talks continued.
Ross would not say whether Gator could now serve pop-up ads over the news sites, or whether the settlement included any payments.
Officials at Gator, based in a Redwood City, CA, have declined comment.
Internet users inherit Gator's advertising software when they install a separate product for filling out online forms and remembering passwords. Gator also comes equipped with free software from other companies, including games and file-sharing programs.
As users surf the Internet, Gator runs in the background and delivers advertisements that plaintiffs said obscured their own ads and content.
Though the Gator ads are marked 'GAIN' ' for Gator Advertising and Information Network ' the publishers worried that many consumers did not know the difference and would instead blame the news organization and its site for an unpleasant experience.
Gator, which claims 30 million active users and 500 advertisers, has contended that its pop-up windows are no different than what happens when a user runs instant messaging, e-mail or other programs in separate windows while surfing a Web site.
Gator still faces similar lawsuits from United Parcel Service, which said unauthorized pop-ups have included ads for rival FedEx Corp., and from Six Continents Hotels, which operates Holiday Inn and Crowne Plaza and complains that Gator directed visitors to deals from Marriott and other competitors.
Other lawsuits, including one filed Jan. 27 by MetroGuide.com travel service, have targeted Gator's advertisers, without naming the company as a defendant.
The advertiser behind those pesky pop-up ads that appear while visiting the NYTimes.com and other major news sites has settled a dispute over the unauthorized and parasitic practice.
According to Terence Ross, the lead attorney for the publishers, the terms of the settlement are confidential.
The parent companies of The
U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton in Alexandria, VA granted a preliminary injunction ordering Gator to stop delivering pop-up ads at the sites run by those companies.
The trial was to begin last month but was postponed while settlement talks continued.
Ross would not say whether Gator could now serve pop-up ads over the news sites, or whether the settlement included any payments.
Officials at Gator, based in a Redwood City, CA, have declined comment.
Internet users inherit Gator's advertising software when they install a separate product for filling out online forms and remembering passwords. Gator also comes equipped with free software from other companies, including games and file-sharing programs.
As users surf the Internet, Gator runs in the background and delivers advertisements that plaintiffs said obscured their own ads and content.
Though the Gator ads are marked 'GAIN' ' for Gator Advertising and Information Network ' the publishers worried that many consumers did not know the difference and would instead blame the news organization and its site for an unpleasant experience.
Gator, which claims 30 million active users and 500 advertisers, has contended that its pop-up windows are no different than what happens when a user runs instant messaging, e-mail or other programs in separate windows while surfing a Web site.
Gator still faces similar lawsuits from
Other lawsuits, including one filed Jan. 27 by MetroGuide.com travel service, have targeted Gator's advertisers, without naming the company as a defendant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.