Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Previous Practice Tips have discussed the usefulness of the Internet in locating expert witnesses and in researching medical issues present in your product liability case. (See February 2002 Practice Tip 'Search the Internet for Medical Experts' and March 2002 Practice Tip 'Make Use of Internet Medical Sites'). Here is yet another way to use the Internet to your advantage in product liability litigation: Use it to locate and obtain old or otherwise difficult-to-obtain physical and documentary evidence.
eBay, as most people are aware, is the online auction site where Internet users can obtain virtually any item, any day of the week and at any hour of the day. Believe it or not, it is being used more and more to obtain physical evidence for use in litigation. For instance, asbestos plaintiffs' lawyers reportedly have been using eBay to purchase asbestos-containing products and industrial manuals dating back to the 1950s.
If you are involved in litigation involving an older product, eBay ' or any of its auction-site competitors ' can be used to obtain old samples, industrial and shop manuals, parts, advertising, packaging materials, and even labels or other warnings relating to the subject product or to competitors' products marketed at the same time. This physical evidence, which, due to its dated nature, may be difficult to obtain from either your client or from your opponent in discovery, may provide you with useful information relating to defenses and arguments made during the course of the litigation. For example, an old product manual or an item with a product label can provide evidence relating to the state of the art, to the features and warnings distributed by similar products at the same time, to the presence of and nature of warnings, and/or even to the absence of warnings. And of course, being able to show the jury the item in dispute can be of significant value.
Of course, there are some caveats that apply when obtaining physical evidence over the Internet. Postal regulations and other laws may place restrictions on the sending of many materials (including asbestos) through the mail. In addition, physical and documentary evidence obtained outside the normal discovery process may be more subject than usual to various evidentiary challenges. If hurdles like these can be overcome, however, you may very well find your next star exhibit on the Internet.
Julie A. Blum is of counsel to Spriggs & Hollingsworth in Washington, D.C.. Telephone (202) 898-5800.
Previous Practice Tips have discussed the usefulness of the Internet in locating expert witnesses and in researching medical issues present in your product liability case. (See February 2002 Practice Tip 'Search the Internet for Medical Experts' and March 2002 Practice Tip 'Make Use of Internet Medical Sites'). Here is yet another way to use the Internet to your advantage in product liability litigation: Use it to locate and obtain old or otherwise difficult-to-obtain physical and documentary evidence.
eBay, as most people are aware, is the online auction site where Internet users can obtain virtually any item, any day of the week and at any hour of the day. Believe it or not, it is being used more and more to obtain physical evidence for use in litigation. For instance, asbestos plaintiffs' lawyers reportedly have been using eBay to purchase asbestos-containing products and industrial manuals dating back to the 1950s.
If you are involved in litigation involving an older product, eBay ' or any of its auction-site competitors ' can be used to obtain old samples, industrial and shop manuals, parts, advertising, packaging materials, and even labels or other warnings relating to the subject product or to competitors' products marketed at the same time. This physical evidence, which, due to its dated nature, may be difficult to obtain from either your client or from your opponent in discovery, may provide you with useful information relating to defenses and arguments made during the course of the litigation. For example, an old product manual or an item with a product label can provide evidence relating to the state of the art, to the features and warnings distributed by similar products at the same time, to the presence of and nature of warnings, and/or even to the absence of warnings. And of course, being able to show the jury the item in dispute can be of significant value.
Of course, there are some caveats that apply when obtaining physical evidence over the Internet. Postal regulations and other laws may place restrictions on the sending of many materials (including asbestos) through the mail. In addition, physical and documentary evidence obtained outside the normal discovery process may be more subject than usual to various evidentiary challenges. If hurdles like these can be overcome, however, you may very well find your next star exhibit on the Internet.
Julie A. Blum is of counsel to
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.