Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Collaborative Family Law Practice and You
Have you considered making your matrimonial practice collaborative? That's the system currently gaining favor around the country whereby divorcing couples seek to resolve issues with the aid of collaborative attorneys who take part in discussions involving both divorcing parties and their attorneys. The goal is to bring all parties to a solution that is as mutually satisfying as possible with as little friction as possible. The collaborative method came into being in 1990 when Minnesota attorney Stuart Webb and some of his colleagues formed a group they called the Collaborative Law Institute. Since then, a number of other regional groups have formed around the United States.
How is collaborative law different from mediation? The main difference is that in mediation, the divorcing parties represent themselves, discussing issues with the help of the mediator. And while the mediator may give information about the law to the parties, he or she cannot offer either of them legal advice. This system may work well for some divorcing couples, but it may not be for everyone. For instance, the husband and wife may have different levels of knowledge or one might simply be more assertive than the other, rendering the balance of power uneven. For them ' or at least for the disadvantaged spouse in this equation ' mediation may not be the best answer.
Collaborative Divorce
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?