Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

EEOC Settles Sexual Harassment Suit for $2.3 Million

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
October 07, 2003

The New York District Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced that it had entered into a Consent Decree in a sexual harassment case under which four former female employees and their private counsel will receive $2.3 million from Simat, Helliesen & Eichner and Reed Telepublishing. EEOC v. Simat, Helliesen & Eichner, 97 Civ. 7168; Tesoro v. Simat, Helliesen & Eichner, 97 Civ. 7176.

In the lawsuits, the EEOC alleged that the former president of Simat, Helliesen & Eicher harassed female employees in its New York office, which resulted in a hostile work environment. The EEOC also alleged that the companies failed to take prompt and appropriate action to end the harassment.


The Consent Decree requires the companies to conduct intensive sexual harassment training for their managers and employees. The EEOC's Regional Attorney in New York, Katherine Bissell, stated: 'The EEOC takes very seriously allegations of sexual harassment, particularly when the accused harasser is a high-level executive, as is the case in this lawsuit.'

Spencer Lewis, the director of the New York District Office of the EEOC, said, 'The EEOC wants to ensure that every individual has the freedom to compete in the workplace on a level playing field ' regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age or disability. Employers in general, and the American economy in particular, benefit when every employee has the full opportunity to achieve his or her fullest potential.'

The New York District Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced that it had entered into a Consent Decree in a sexual harassment case under which four former female employees and their private counsel will receive $2.3 million from Simat, Helliesen & Eichner and Reed Telepublishing. EEOC v. Simat, Helliesen & Eichner, 97 Civ. 7168; Tesoro v. Simat, Helliesen & Eichner, 97 Civ. 7176.

In the lawsuits, the EEOC alleged that the former president of Simat, Helliesen & Eicher harassed female employees in its New York office, which resulted in a hostile work environment. The EEOC also alleged that the companies failed to take prompt and appropriate action to end the harassment.


The Consent Decree requires the companies to conduct intensive sexual harassment training for their managers and employees. The EEOC's Regional Attorney in New York, Katherine Bissell, stated: 'The EEOC takes very seriously allegations of sexual harassment, particularly when the accused harasser is a high-level executive, as is the case in this lawsuit.'

Spencer Lewis, the director of the New York District Office of the EEOC, said, 'The EEOC wants to ensure that every individual has the freedom to compete in the workplace on a level playing field ' regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age or disability. Employers in general, and the American economy in particular, benefit when every employee has the full opportunity to achieve his or her fullest potential.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.