Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Tort Hellhole' Moves to Curtail Access
Mississippi plaintiffs' lawyers, battered by a 2-year fight with medical and business lobbyists, are seeking ways to undermine new laws that limit civil litigants' access and recoveries in the state that has been dubbed a 'tort hellhole.' Meanwhile, the tort reform juggernaut is rumbling into other states.
'We expect this to be, legislatively, the busiest year since '95,' said Michael Hotra, who handles legislative efforts for the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) in Washington, D.C. It was his group that put Mississippi on a list of 10 'tort hellholes.' Others included jurisdictions in California, Texas, Illinois and Missouri. Hotra expects Missouri, Georgia and South Carolina to consider packages to reduce venues, strengthen proof standards and restrict civil damages. Ohio has limited medical malpractice awards to $1 million for pain and suffering. Additional action is expected there. Similar steps are expected in Florida, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and in West Virginia, where doctors on Jan. 13 marched on the state capital, blaming lawsuits for increases in malpractice insurance costs. Under pressure from the doctors, Gov. Bob Wise proposed damage caps. Texas is expected to study curtailing tactics to collect asbestos damages from the users of the product instead of the bankrupt manufacturers. Several legislatures will consider curbs on medical monitoring for future damages. Even the presidency has become involved: President George W. Bush, on Jan. 14 and again in his Jan. 28 State of the Union address, urged Congress to cap damages in medical malpractice suits.
Mississippi a Target?
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.