Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Q: Is a licensing board an employer under federal discrimination law where it is empowered to preclude or limit employment opportunities for covered employees?
No. Courts in the Second Circuit have generally rejected claims against governmental licensing bodies on the grounds that they are not employers or employment agencies under federal discrimination laws. 'Thus, although the granting or withholding of a license affects the employment prospects of a would-be licensee, in most cases this has not made the licensing body an employer who can be liable under Title VII, the ADA or the ADEA.' Bonbay v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission, 2003 WL 21649453 (S.D.N.Y. 7/14/03)
Q: Is a licensing board an employer under federal discrimination law where it is empowered to preclude or limit employment opportunities for covered employees?
No. Courts in the Second Circuit have generally rejected claims against governmental licensing bodies on the grounds that they are not employers or employment agencies under federal discrimination laws. 'Thus, although the granting or withholding of a license affects the employment prospects of a would-be licensee, in most cases this has not made the licensing body an employer who can be liable under Title VII, the ADA or the ADEA.' Bonbay v.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.