Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

CA Governor Signs Harshest Anti-Spam Bill in U.S.

By Steven Salkin, Esq.
October 21, 2003

He may be voted out of office soon, but California Governor Gray Davis is making his mark in the Internet world before he goes. On September 23, Davis signed what to date is the toughest anti-spam bill in the U.S. The bill, written by Democratic State Senator Kevin Murray, allows for penalties of $1000 per unsolicited e-mail and as much as $1 million for all-out spam campaigns. Not only those that send spam, but also those whose products and services are advertised, are targeted.

“People are tired of getting this stuff in their inbox,” Murray says. “When it can be 30%, 40%, 50% of the e-mail you receive, it's costing people money and aggravation.”

Davis said in a statement: “California is sending a clear message to Internet spammers: we will not allow you to litter the information superhighway with e-mail trash.”

San Francisco-based technology research firm, Ferris Research, has estimated that spam cost U.S. companies almost $9 billion in lost productivity & technical support in 2002.

He may be voted out of office soon, but California Governor Gray Davis is making his mark in the Internet world before he goes. On September 23, Davis signed what to date is the toughest anti-spam bill in the U.S. The bill, written by Democratic State Senator Kevin Murray, allows for penalties of $1000 per unsolicited e-mail and as much as $1 million for all-out spam campaigns. Not only those that send spam, but also those whose products and services are advertised, are targeted.

“People are tired of getting this stuff in their inbox,” Murray says. “When it can be 30%, 40%, 50% of the e-mail you receive, it's costing people money and aggravation.”

Davis said in a statement: “California is sending a clear message to Internet spammers: we will not allow you to litter the information superhighway with e-mail trash.”

San Francisco-based technology research firm, Ferris Research, has estimated that spam cost U.S. companies almost $9 billion in lost productivity & technical support in 2002.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.