Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A Rush To Beat Tort Law Deadlines
The legislative package of the American Medical Association aimed at limiting suits against doctors and hospitals has been unusually successful this year. Parts of it passed in more state legislatures in 2003 than in all previous years combined. But the states jumping aboard the medical liability “tort reform” bandwagon are learning what others already knew; As lawyers rush to beat deadlines, the legislation causes a surge in the suits that it was designed to stop.
Seven states — Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia – -have just adopted some of the tort law changes pushed by organized medicine. Most have gone into effect since mid-August. Interviews with court officials and news accounts suggest that attorneys in those states have been filing all the suits they can before the deadline.
In Houston, for example, Charles Bacarisse, clerk of the district court in Harris County, reported a 500% increase in the number of civil suit filings, some 2700 in the weeks before Sept. 1, when the new Texas laws became effective. Texas newspapers reported similar surges in Dallas and Corpus Christi, as did the media in Little Rock, AK; Orlando, FL; Charleston, WV; and Oklahoma City.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.