Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

KickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

FASB Issues Additional Guidance on FIN 46

By Jeffrey H. Ellis
November 01, 2003

On July 23, 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) approved the issuance of five FASB Staff Positions (FSPs) providing guidance on the application of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. (An FSP is the means by which the FASB staff communicates its views on the proper application of FASB literature when it believes there is only one acceptable interpretation. Prior to February 2003, FASB staff guidance was communicated through Staff Implementation Guides or announcements at meetings of the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force.) The FSPs issued by the staff include:

  • FIN 46-1, “Applicability of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to Entities Subject to the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide, Health Care Organizations”
  • FIN 46-2, “Reporting Variable Interests in Specified Assets of Variable Interest Entities as Separate Variable Interest Entities under Paragraph 13 of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”
  • FIN 46-3, “Application of Paragraph 5 of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, When Variable Interests in Specified Assets of a Variable Interest Entity Are Not Considered Interests in the Entity under Paragraph 12 of Interpretation 46″
  • FIN 46-4, “Transition Requirements for Initial Application of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”
  • FIN 46-5, “Calculation of Expected Losses under FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.”

The FASB staff has also proposed FSPs on: 1) the treatment of fees paid to decision makers and guarantors in determining expected losses and expected residual returns and 2) the impact of rights to remove a decision maker on the computation of expected residual returns, but has not finalized that guidance.

A brief explanation of each of the final FSPs and their impact on FIN 46 follows.

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.