Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Spotlight: Request in Advance Master Landlord's Consent to Sublease

By William Crowe
November 01, 2003

In many instances a prospective sublandlord requires the consent of its master landlord in order to enter into a sublease. Virtually all well-crafted subleases are expressly contingent upon the receipt by the parties of a written consent by the master landlord to the sublease. As the amount of sublease space on the market has increased, master landlords have moved away from a simple consent to a lengthy, comprehensive (and, in some instances, overreaching) form of consent. In reviewing such consent forms, subtenants should be particularly wary of language requiring the subtenant to attorn to the master landlord under the terms of the master lease or other provisions that require the subtenant to comply with master lease provisions that would otherwise be the responsibility of the sublandlord. The use of these more aggressive landlord consent forms frequently results in the addition of a second phase to the sublease process where the sublandlord, subtenant, and master landlord negotiate, or attempt to negotiate, the terms of the master landlord consent following the execution of the sublease. Of course, this process adds delay and uncertainty to the goal of concluding a binding deal and commencing rent payments under the sublease.

To avoid such delays, the sublandlord should request the master landlord's form of consent in advance. This allows the sublandlord and the prospective subtenant to vet the consent in advance, thereby lessening or eliminating the likelihood of wrangling over the terms of the consent following the execution of the sublease. One further step is for the parties to the sublease to attach the form of consent as an exhibit to the sublease. If a form consent is attached, the sublease should include a provision similar to the following: “Sublandlord and Subtenant agree that the Landlord's Consent form attached hereto as Exhibit X is deemed to be acceptable to Sublandlord and Subtenant and the Landlord's Consent shall be deemed acceptable to the parties if provided in a form substantially similar to that provided on said Exhibit X.” The attachment of the form consent and inclusion of an accompanying sublease provision evidencing the parties' acceptance should obviate any delay in obtaining the master landlord's consent following the execution of the sublease.



William Crowe

In many instances a prospective sublandlord requires the consent of its master landlord in order to enter into a sublease. Virtually all well-crafted subleases are expressly contingent upon the receipt by the parties of a written consent by the master landlord to the sublease. As the amount of sublease space on the market has increased, master landlords have moved away from a simple consent to a lengthy, comprehensive (and, in some instances, overreaching) form of consent. In reviewing such consent forms, subtenants should be particularly wary of language requiring the subtenant to attorn to the master landlord under the terms of the master lease or other provisions that require the subtenant to comply with master lease provisions that would otherwise be the responsibility of the sublandlord. The use of these more aggressive landlord consent forms frequently results in the addition of a second phase to the sublease process where the sublandlord, subtenant, and master landlord negotiate, or attempt to negotiate, the terms of the master landlord consent following the execution of the sublease. Of course, this process adds delay and uncertainty to the goal of concluding a binding deal and commencing rent payments under the sublease.

To avoid such delays, the sublandlord should request the master landlord's form of consent in advance. This allows the sublandlord and the prospective subtenant to vet the consent in advance, thereby lessening or eliminating the likelihood of wrangling over the terms of the consent following the execution of the sublease. One further step is for the parties to the sublease to attach the form of consent as an exhibit to the sublease. If a form consent is attached, the sublease should include a provision similar to the following: “Sublandlord and Subtenant agree that the Landlord's Consent form attached hereto as Exhibit X is deemed to be acceptable to Sublandlord and Subtenant and the Landlord's Consent shall be deemed acceptable to the parties if provided in a form substantially similar to that provided on said Exhibit X.” The attachment of the form consent and inclusion of an accompanying sublease provision evidencing the parties' acceptance should obviate any delay in obtaining the master landlord's consent following the execution of the sublease.



William Crowe

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.