Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act Claims in Florida Need Not Be Stayed Until Judgment
In a Sept. 25, 2003, opinion, the Florida Supreme Court held that a claim under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (FUFTA) does not need to be stayed until a judgment is obtained against the alleged fraudulent transferor. Friedman v. Heart Institute of Port St. Lucie, Inc., 2003 WL 22208004 (Fla. 2003).
Friedman was terminated as a physician by the Heart Institute of Port St. Lucie, Inc. (the “Heart Institute”). Subsequently, the Heart Institute commenced an action to enforce a noncompete clause in Friedman's contract with the Heart Institute. The Heart Institute later amended its complaint to include a claim under the FUFTA alleging that Friedman fraudulently transferred the proceeds from the sale of his home to his fiancee in an effort to divest himself of assets. Friedman moved to stay the FUFTA claim and its concomitant discovery until after a judgment was obtained in the underlying breach of contract claim.
The Florida Supreme Court observed that:
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.