Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Certifying Experts' Credentials Remain Confidential in PA
Explaining the new rules in Pennsylvania, Common Pleas Judge Mark I. Bernstein's opinion in Frunzi v. Muller, PICS Case No. 03-1573 (C.P. Philadelphia 10/25/03) emphasized that the identity and credentials of plaintiffs' experts certifying the validity of medical malpractice cases cannot be disclosed until 30 days after dismissal. This was the first reported case in Pennsylvania dealing with the new requirement, which went into effect January 27, that within 60 days of the filing of a professional liability action, a certificate of merit must be filed with the court containing a certification that a licensed professional has reviewed the plaintiff's case and found that there may have been a breach of professional standards that caused plaintiff harm.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.