Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Marital Estate: Stock Options and Restricted Stock

By Edward R. Skone
November 30, 2003

Stock options became a large part of many marital estates involved in marriage dissolution during the “bubble” of the late 1990s. As one would expect, the courts struggled with the issues this new situation presented, primarily what options were to be included in the marital estate. The following possible scenarios indicate the complexities:

  • Stock options received prior to marriage and vesting during marriage;
  • Stock options granted prior to marriage and vesting during marriage;
  • Stock options granted during marriage and vesting during marriage;
  • Stock options granted during marriage and vesting after marriage.

Other complicating factors created more issues. Courts were faced with situations where non-marital property was used to pay the strike price on community options. Most stock plans do not allow the non-employee spouse to own stock options. Consequently, terms of beneficial ownership of the options by the employee-spouse for the other spouse had to be created. Some stock options were granted as a reward for services performed in the past and in part to retain the employee in the future. This further complicated the determination of whether or not the stock options were marital property.

Stock options and restricted stock have been a part of executive compensation for many years. However, it was not until the late 1980s, with the mushrooming of new companies in the technical computer and science industries, that these forms of compensation, primarily stock options, became popular and available to a broad range of employees, not just senior executives.

Evolving Case Law

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.