Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What constitutes an acceptable book manuscript has been at the heart of numerous disputes between authors and publishers. An acceptance clause in a recent dispute stated:
A Work shall be “acceptable” under this Agreement if such Work meets a standard comparable to the literary merit of Author's previous works.
In this case, internationally known author Mark Helprin signed a five-book deal containing a $2 million advance with Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc. (HBJ) in 1989. In 1995, HBJ published “Memoir from Antproof Case,” Helprin's first book under the contract. Helprin submitted the draft for the second book in October 2002. Two months later, HBJ's president wrote Helprin that the manuscript was unacceptable. Helprin filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging in part that HBJ's rejection of the second book amounted to breach of contract.
HBJ moved to dismiss, contending that Helprin was barred from filing suit by Paragraph 8 of the publishing agreement that stated “if a Work is not published within the time provided in Paragraph 6 [ie, within 18 months after delivery and acceptance of the final revised manuscript] … Author may thereafter request Publisher by written notice … to publish such Work within six months after Publisher's receipt of Author's request. If, after receipt of such notice, Publisher fails to publish such Work within such period, this Agreement will terminate with respect to such Work immediately and automatically at the end of such period, all rights to such Work will revert to Author on the effective date of termination without further obligation or liability on the part of Publisher, and Author will have the right to retain any advances previously paid, but will be entitled to no other compensation, remedy, or damages, and Author will retain the right to sell such Work to another publisher and retain the proceeds. Publisher's failure to publish a Work that it has accepted according to the provisions … hereof will not alter the conditions under which Author is deemed to have satisfied his obligation in regard to such Work.”
Under HBJ's reasoning, despite rejecting the manuscript, the book was acceptable for purposes of these provisions because Helprin claimed in his suit that the manuscript met the terms of the contract's acceptability clause.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?