Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
SEC Charges Former Officers of Gateway
The SEC has filed fraud charges against the former CEO, CFO, and controller of San Diego-based Gateway, Inc. for engaging in a fraudulent earnings manipulation scheme to meet Wall Street analysts' expectations, and for making false statements and concealing material information about the success of Gateway's personal computer business, in the second and third quarters of 2000. The suit seeks antifraud injunctions, civil money penalties, disgorgement of improper gains, and orders permanently barring the defendants from serving as officers or directors of public companies.
The SEC's complaint alleges that defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose significant trends in Gateway's business, such as that a material portion of Gateway's sales were generated through high-risk loan financing; that PC sales growth was declining; that, by the end of the third quarter, only a small percentage of net income was associated with PC sales; and that revenue and earnings included various one-time transactions. Through these actions, it is alleged, the defendants gave the false and misleading impression that Gateway, unlike many of its competitors, was outpacing an industry trend of decreasing sales of personal computers.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?