Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We are at a wonderful period in time in many ways. We are enjoying the year-end holiday season with our family and friends, the Dow index has crested the 10,000 mark, and the capture of Saddam Hussein is now behind us. After 3 years of negative market performance returns displayed each time we opened our statements, we get to see a net change in value that is a positive number instead of negative.
As investors, we do have many good reasons to celebrate, and should. But we should not forget what happened last time the party got out of hand and especially what happened with the high-speculative behavior exhibited with Nasdaq stocks. It would be time well spent to take
a moment and reflect on that period of seemingly endless growth, and the decisions and investments choices that we made. If given the ability to go back in time, what would you do different regarding your investments if given a second chance?
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?