Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Employees of Third-Party Employer Not Entitled To Retroactive Benefits
The Fifth Circuit recently held that workers who performed services for Mobil Corp. while on the payroll of third-party companies were not entitled to retroactive employment benefits. MacLachlan v. ExxonMobil Corp., 2003 WL 22508859 (5th Cir. Nov. 20, 2003).
Prior to the merger of Mobil and Exxon Corp. in 1999, John MacLachlan provided services for Mobil Corp. for 11 years as an electronic technician. However, he was directly employed during that time by an outside contractor. (Several other plaintiffs were similarly employed by third-party companies while working for Mobil.) All were considered by Mobil to be independent contractors or employees of the third parties.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.