Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A study whose results were reported December 8 asserts that the pharmaceutical industry's “blockbuster” approach to developing new drugs is no longer viable in today's marketplace. The study, conducted by Bain & Co., a business consulting firm with offices in 19 countries, found that the costs for discovering, developing and launching each new drug had risen to $1.7 billion, an increase of 55% over the average costs for the 5 years from 1995 to 2000. Driving costs upward, the study reports, are declining R&D productivity (one drug compound for every 13 discovered and placed in clinical trials now makes it to market, compared to one in eight between 1995 and 2000), rising costs of commercialization, increasing payor influence (including aggressive patent challenges) and shorter exclusivity periods. These rising costs are expected to drive down investment returns.
One of the co-authors of the study, Ashish Singh, director of Bain's Global Healthcare Practice, opines that large pharmaceutical concerns will need to abandon their present drug development models if they are to remain competitive, but they have thus far failed to do so because they are “prisoner[s] of past successes.” The study suggests that a better strategy for pharmaceutical product development would include increased use of partnerships to spread risk, a more customer-driven approach and development of a more decentralized organizational model based on discrete business units.
For more information, see the Bain Web site at www.Bain.com.
A study whose results were reported December 8 asserts that the pharmaceutical industry's “blockbuster” approach to developing new drugs is no longer viable in today's marketplace. The study, conducted by Bain & Co., a business consulting firm with offices in 19 countries, found that the costs for discovering, developing and launching each new drug had risen to $1.7 billion, an increase of 55% over the average costs for the 5 years from 1995 to 2000. Driving costs upward, the study reports, are declining R&D productivity (one drug compound for every 13 discovered and placed in clinical trials now makes it to market, compared to one in eight between 1995 and 2000), rising costs of commercialization, increasing payor influence (including aggressive patent challenges) and shorter exclusivity periods. These rising costs are expected to drive down investment returns.
One of the co-authors of the study, Ashish Singh, director of Bain's Global Healthcare Practice, opines that large pharmaceutical concerns will need to abandon their present drug development models if they are to remain competitive, but they have thus far failed to do so because they are “prisoner[s] of past successes.” The study suggests that a better strategy for pharmaceutical product development would include increased use of partnerships to spread risk, a more customer-driven approach and development of a more decentralized organizational model based on discrete business units.
For more information, see the Bain Web site at www.Bain.com.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.