Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What Not to Do in a Hostile Work Environment Case
A recent decision, Boggs v. Die Fliedermaus, d/b/a Le Bar Bat, 2003 WL 22299315 (S.D.N.Y. 10/07/03) (Sweet, D. J.), offers many lessons for employers about what to do, and not to do, to position themselves for a successful summary judgment motion in a hostile work environment case.
This dispute has an extensive and tortured history. The plaintiffs in Boggs were hostesses at Le Bar Bat, a well-known New York City bar and restaurant. One of the Defendants, Patrick Kelly, the Director of Banquets and Public Relations, had earlier been charged with, and convicted of, federal crimes of obstruction of justice and witness tampering for trying to have witnesses lie about events. Defendant Larry Cerrone, the General Manager, was alleged to have referred to three of the African-American plaintiffs as “dark, light, and semi-sweet chocolate,” and when they worked nights together, he referred to the shift as “chocolate night”. When one of these plaintiffs complained, he apologized, but continued thereafter to refer to that employee as “you people.” Cerrone was also accused of speaking to one of the plaintiffs in Ebonics for 2 weeks. Another employee said Cerrone frequently made comments of a sexual nature to her and engaged in unwanted physical contact, like hugging, kissing, and rubbing her shoulders, leading her to quit her job.
How the Court Ruled
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.