Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Selling 'Free and Clear': Will It Continue?
Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code provides an extraordinary tool to trustees and debtors in possession — the ability to sell property “free and clear.” This unique power, unavailable to a seller outside bankruptcy, not only facilitates the tasks of liquidation or reorganization, but it may even be the critical incentive for entering bankruptcy in the first place. It has now become the principal focus of many Chapter 11 cases.
Section 363 Sales in Chapter 11
Sales of estate assets under 11 U.S.C. ' 363 have always been the primary working tool of Chapter 7 trustees, whose straightforward mission is to sell assets and distribute the proceeds. The sale of assets under Section 363 in Chapter 11 cases, however, has taken longer to win widespread acceptance as a standard part of the reorganization process. The alternative to Section 363 sales in Chapter 11 is the sale of assets as part of a Chapter 11 plan, as recognized by 11 U.S.C. '' 1123(a)(5)(D) (a plan shall “provide adequate means for the plan's implementation, such as … sale of all or any part of the property of the estate, either subject to or free of any lien”) and 1141(c) (“after confirmation of a plan, the property dealt with by the plan is free and clear of all claims and interests of creditors”).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?