Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, ruled that the creator of a proposed stage or TV talent show entitled “American Idol” did not have a claim for false designation of origin under the federal Lanham Act against the producers of the TV series with the same name. Keane v. Fox Television Stations Inc., 03-1642.
Plaintiff Harry Keane Jr. had claimed that he had fulfilled the Lanham Act's interstate commerce requirement in distributing a sales packet in which he sought investors for his project. But the district court noted a discrepancy between how Keane described the sales packet in his complaint and the evidence itself: “Nothing about the substance of this [sales] letter, which lacks any return address, telephone number, or other contact information, suggests that it embodies an attempt to sell an idea to production companies. Instead, it appears to be an effort to get 'sponsorship' from 'business owners' for Keane's company so that Keane could produce 'family musical theatre' in Marshalltown, IA. The letter does not mention a 'sales packet' or allude to any enclosures. … [In any case, s]eeking 'sponsorship' for one's own production and seeking to sell an idea so that others might turn it into a production are two distinct activities.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.