Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court continues to keep employers on their toes by dealing with cases involving employment issues this term. During the first week of December, the Court issued its decision in Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez, No. 02-749, ___ S. Ct. ___ (2003), an ADA case involving the legality of an employer policy prohibiting the rehire of individuals fired for violating the employer's drug use policy. Also, the Court agreed to consider two other employment cases. First, in Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders, the Court will decide whether constructive discharge is a “tangible employment action” for purposes of sexual harassment claims. Second, in Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz, the Court will tackle an issue involving ERISA's anti-cutback rule for pension benefits.
In Raytheon, the Court declined to decide the issue generating interest among employment law practitioners (and upon which it had granted certiorari): “whether the ADA confers preferential rehire rights on disabled employees lawfully terminated for violating workplace conduct rules.” Instead, the Court sent the decision back to the Ninth Circuit due to its failure to apply the proper standard for evaluating the plaintiff's claims.
This case involved an appeal from the Ninth Circuit's decision reversing a grant of summary judgment in favor of Raytheon Company in claims brought by a former employee, Joe Hernandez. Hernandez worked for Hughes Missile Systems (later acquired by Raytheon) for 25 years. In July 1991, Hernandez tested positive for cocaine use on the job, an offense that was grounds for his immediate termination. Rather than being terminated, however, Hernandez accepted the provided option to resign in lieu of termination, which he chose to do. This choice was noted on his personnel file and, pursuant to an “unwritten” policy, resulted in his ineligibility for rehire.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.