Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Quest for Automated Corporate Governance Tool Leads to hCue
With the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring that all Section 16 insider-trading transactions be reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in electronic format and within two business days, SWS Group Inc., like many companies, struggled with how to comply with the new law quickly and cost effectively.
SWS Group is a Dallas-based, full-service securities and banking firm with more than 1000 employees nationwide. The company has approximately a dozen subsidiaries including Southwest Securities, Inc., First Savings Bank, SWS Financial Services, Inc., and SWS Capital Corporation.
Searching for a Solution
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?