Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Does the Food and Drug Administration have authority to force manufacturers of prescription drug products to switch those products to over-the-counter (OTC) distribution against their will? The FDA is currently grappling with this issue, a dispute that has generated substantial controversy, including statements by FDA officials and coverage in leading newspapers.
The agency has under active consideration a 1998 Citizens Petition filed by WellPoint Health Networks, a health insurer, requesting that the FDA force the manufacturers of three leading allergy medications — Allegra/Allegra-D, Claritin/Claritin-D, and Zyrtec — to switch these products from Rx to OTC status. In a 2002 petition, WellPoint added a fourth drug, Clarinex. Claritin's manufacturer has voluntarily switched that product, but the makers of Allegra, Zyrtec, and Clarinex are contesting the FDA's authority and the wisdom of forcing a switch. High-ranking FDA officials have been quoted in the press stating that FDA has such authority.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.