Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Verdicts
Settlement Made in Amputation Case
In the case of Gibbons v. Chhabra, a Bergen County, NJ, judge approved a $1.5 million medical malpractice settlement on Dec. 4th, 2003 for a child whose arm had to be partially amputated due to a severed artery. The injury occurred in the neonatal intensive care unit of a Hackensack, NJ, hospital where a 4-day-old baby was being cared for after his premature birth at about 30 weeks. Plaintiffs alleged that a doctor's attempt to place a long-term catheter line into the child's right armpit severed his artery. The child's arm had to be amputated below the elbow shortly thereafter. He now wears a prosthesis, which will have to be replaced as he grows. The plaintiffs alleged that the line should have been inserted in the scalp because the armpit was too risky a location. Judge Charles Walsh helped the parties reach agreement on Oct. 20, 2003. Judge Joseph Rosa approved the deal on Dec. 4, 2003, after a friendly hearing.
Sexual Misconduct Not Malpractice
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?