Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Workplace Rights of Domestic Violence Victims

By Jay W. Waks and Jordan B. Schwartz
February 09, 2004

The New York City Human Rights Law was amended to require employers to provide reasonable accommodation to employees and applicants who are victims of domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking, and to prevent employers from discriminating against them because of their status as victims. NYC Adm. Code 8-101, 8-102, 8-107 and 8-107.1

According to Mayor Bloomberg, who signed the amendment into law on Dec. 22, 2003, these people are often unable to separate their status as victims from their jobs due to outside harassment or sexual assault impacting them at their workplace. Many times, victims of these crimes are late or miss several days of work, which can eventually lead to the loss of a job. Mayor Bloomberg believes that providing “reasonable accommodation” in the workplace will enable victims to remain productive and self-reliant, as well as help employers to retain their employees, minimize on-the-job disruptions and increase productivity.

'Reasonable Accommodation'

Of considerable importance to employers, a victim requesting a “reasonable accommodation” must be able to provide documentation of his or her status as a victim and otherwise be able to “satisfy the essential requisites of the job.” Examples of proper documentation would include statements of an employee's agent, a victim services volunteer, an attorney, a clergy member, a medical services provider, or a police or court record, or other corroborating evidence. Considering that victims of domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking tend to be hesitant to report this treatment to or to follow up with the proper authorities, some may lack the necessary documentation to claim the statute's protection.

To the extent that the reasonable accommodation requirement is triggered, however, this new law provides absolutely no guidance as to what would be “reasonable.” At the very least, employers may be compelled to grant some time off to abused employees so they can cope with matters related to their abuse and to take steps to protect employees from stalkers and others who attempt to harass them at work. But would it require an armed guard at the workplace; frequent break periods; adjustment of hours to permit off-premises (or on-premises) counseling? The answers to these and other questions are not spelled out in the law or in any statements of the Mayor. Moreover, in the context of psychological injuries arising from domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking, issues of the reasonableness of offered accommodation may lead to a battle of experts or of wills.

'Undue Hardship' Defense

Aside from the reasonableness of the accommodation offered by the employer, this new amendment would permit an “undue hardship” defense. Specifically, the amendment spells out at least four factors that would need to be analyzed in determining whether a reasonable accommodation would be an “undue hardship” for the “covered entity' business.” In short, these factors include: 1) the nature and cost of the requested accommodations; 2) the impact of the reasonable accommodation on overall financial resources or other aspects of the facility; 3) the employer's overall financial resources; and 4) the composition, structure, and functions of the employer's operation.

Conclusion

New York is the first municipality to enact a law extending this type of workplace protection to victims of domestic violence, sex offenses and stalking. Only time will tell if the ambiguities surrounding the documentation of status requirement and the concepts of “reasonable accommodation” and “undue hardship” will frustrate the victims of domestic violence, sex offenses and stalking in the workplace, or create unfair hardships for their employers.



Jay W. Waks Jordan B. Schwartz

The New York City Human Rights Law was amended to require employers to provide reasonable accommodation to employees and applicants who are victims of domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking, and to prevent employers from discriminating against them because of their status as victims. NYC Adm. Code 8-101, 8-102, 8-107 and 8-107.1

According to Mayor Bloomberg, who signed the amendment into law on Dec. 22, 2003, these people are often unable to separate their status as victims from their jobs due to outside harassment or sexual assault impacting them at their workplace. Many times, victims of these crimes are late or miss several days of work, which can eventually lead to the loss of a job. Mayor Bloomberg believes that providing “reasonable accommodation” in the workplace will enable victims to remain productive and self-reliant, as well as help employers to retain their employees, minimize on-the-job disruptions and increase productivity.

'Reasonable Accommodation'

Of considerable importance to employers, a victim requesting a “reasonable accommodation” must be able to provide documentation of his or her status as a victim and otherwise be able to “satisfy the essential requisites of the job.” Examples of proper documentation would include statements of an employee's agent, a victim services volunteer, an attorney, a clergy member, a medical services provider, or a police or court record, or other corroborating evidence. Considering that victims of domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking tend to be hesitant to report this treatment to or to follow up with the proper authorities, some may lack the necessary documentation to claim the statute's protection.

To the extent that the reasonable accommodation requirement is triggered, however, this new law provides absolutely no guidance as to what would be “reasonable.” At the very least, employers may be compelled to grant some time off to abused employees so they can cope with matters related to their abuse and to take steps to protect employees from stalkers and others who attempt to harass them at work. But would it require an armed guard at the workplace; frequent break periods; adjustment of hours to permit off-premises (or on-premises) counseling? The answers to these and other questions are not spelled out in the law or in any statements of the Mayor. Moreover, in the context of psychological injuries arising from domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking, issues of the reasonableness of offered accommodation may lead to a battle of experts or of wills.

'Undue Hardship' Defense

Aside from the reasonableness of the accommodation offered by the employer, this new amendment would permit an “undue hardship” defense. Specifically, the amendment spells out at least four factors that would need to be analyzed in determining whether a reasonable accommodation would be an “undue hardship” for the “covered entity' business.” In short, these factors include: 1) the nature and cost of the requested accommodations; 2) the impact of the reasonable accommodation on overall financial resources or other aspects of the facility; 3) the employer's overall financial resources; and 4) the composition, structure, and functions of the employer's operation.

Conclusion

New York is the first municipality to enact a law extending this type of workplace protection to victims of domestic violence, sex offenses and stalking. Only time will tell if the ambiguities surrounding the documentation of status requirement and the concepts of “reasonable accommodation” and “undue hardship” will frustrate the victims of domestic violence, sex offenses and stalking in the workplace, or create unfair hardships for their employers.



Jay W. Waks Kaye Scholer LLP New York Jordan B. Schwartz

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.