Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bad Faith Not Necessary for Award of Attorneys' Fees for Willful Infringement
The Ninth Circuit held in Earthquake Sound Corp. v. Bumper Indus., 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25286 (9th Cir. 2003), that once there is a determination of willful trademark infringement, a separate determination of bad faith is not necessary in order to award attorneys' fees. The district court found that defendants' use of the term “Carquake” in connection with car stereos was a willful, deliberate and knowing infringement of plaintiff's trademarks “Bass-Quake” and “Quake,” and awarded attorneys' fees. On appeal, defendants argued that attorneys' fees could only be awarded in “exceptional” cases and that the district court did not consider evidence that the marks were used in good faith. The Ninth Circuit held that a court did not need to establish bad faith where there was sufficient evidence to establish willful infringement. “[Defendants'] claims of good faith are unavailing. The issue is not necessarily one of bad faith: willful or deliberate infringement will suffice.” The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to award attorneys' fees.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.