Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Employers face many challenges stemming from the fact that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects alcoholic employees from discrimination, including, in some instances, requiring an employer to provide reasonable accommodations to the employee. The ADA also protects drug addicts, as long as the employee is no longer actively engaged in the use of illegal drugs.
The ADA's protection of alcoholics and recovered drug addicts raises questions about an employer's ability to respond to employees who have violated workplace rules prohibiting employees from being under the influence at work. For example, you have a long-term employee who came to work drunk in violation of your workplace rules. The employee states he is an alcoholic and requests a leave of absence to obtain treatment. Can you refuse to grant his request and terminate his employment without violating the ADA? Similarly, what if, rather than requesting an accommodation, the employee resigned and then, having undergone a successful 12-step program, seeks to be rehired? Can you lawfully refuse to rehire him based upon your neutrally applied policy of not rehiring employees terminated for violation of workplace rules?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.