Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
You think your company has a good case. From what you can gather, the allegations that your company stole trade secrets from a rival are completely unfounded. But then you enter discovery. Your opposition requests a whole host of e-mails ' predictable these days. That's when you realize you have a problem.
Your company's paper documents are retained under a regular schedule ' then destroyed when the are no longer of use ' as a matter of policy, kept no longer than they had to be. But these days, your company produces so many electronic documents ' mostly e-mail communications ' and with that change in technology has come a change in responsibility. Instead of your corporate records manager, your computer people in IT are in charge of e-mail and other electronic documents. To them, it's data, not records. Therein lies the problem.
You quickly realize that with all the storage your IT department has added to accommodate the expanding volume of e-mails your company produces, it has had no systematic program for eliminating e-mails that are no longer needed. As a result, you learn that the amount of e-mails and related electronic documents that must be retrieved under discovery is staggering ' hundreds of thousands.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?