Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The 'Last Chance Agreement'

By Christopher J. Collins
February 27, 2004

Coping with employee drug and alcohol abuse, and its inevitably harmful effects on the workplace, remains a significant problem facing employers today. According to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), more than 14 million Americans use illegal drugs. The numbers for alcohol abuse are equally staggering, with more than 12 million Americans classified as heavy drinkers. See www.dol.gov/asp/programs/drugs/workingpartners/stats. According to the DOL, “most individuals who abuse alcohol and other drugs are employed,” and, as any manager or human resources professional can attest, “when they arrive for work, they don't leave their problems outside the door.” Id.

As if dealing with the impact of drugs and alcohol abuse in the workplace were not difficult enough, a plethora of federal, state and sometimes local laws are implicated. The Drug Free Workplace Act, 41 U.S.C. '701, et seq., requires certain federal contractors to maintain a drug-free workplace and establish a drug-free awareness program. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. '12101, et seq. , a drug addict who is not “currently” using illegal drugs (although what “currently” means is unclear) and an alcoholic may be considered disabled and therefore protected against discrimination based on their condition. Under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. '2601, et seq., drug addiction or alcoholism might qualify as a “serious health condition” triggering application of the FMLA leave entitlement provisions. On top of this, a whole host of state and local laws analogous to the ADA and FMLA might apply.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.