Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Statutory Remedy for Bad Faith Applies Before, During, and After Litigation
In Hollock v. Erie Insurance Exchange, Penna. Superior Court (Jan. 22, 2004) (en banc), the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed an award of $2.8 million in punitive damages and $278,825 for attorneys' fees, interest, and costs, approximately a 10:1 ratio to compensatory damages. Pennsylvania has a statutory cause of action for insurance company bad faith, which allows an award of punitive damages, interest, and attorneys' fees.
The Superior Court ruled that the conduct of Erie in the bad faith litigation itself could be considered in determining whether Erie acted in bad faith toward its policyholder, Jean Hollock. The trial court found that the conduct of Erie's witnesses at trial was “an intentional attempt to conceal, hide or otherwise cover-up the conduct of Erie employees.” The Superior Court ruled that “it was appropriate for the trial court to consider Erie's continued conduct in relation to its insured” because the statutory remedy was designed to remedy all instances of insurance company bad faith, whether occurring before, during or after litigation.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?