Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Songwriters often form their own music publishing companies. If the publishing company sells the songwriter's compositions, what rights will actually be conveyed in the sale?
For example, guitarist Vinnie Vincent served as a member of the rock group KISS from 1982 to 1984. During that time, he co-wrote three songs released on the band's “Creatures of the Night” album. Through his Street Beat Music, Vincent entered into a co-publishing agreement with KISS for a joint 50% ownership of the songs by both parties. The agreement stated that Vincent would receive half of the songwriter's royalties, and that half of the compositions' public performance royalties would be paid to Vincent's Street Beat.
After Vincent left KISS due to disagreements, KISS, Vincent and Street Beat negotiated a settlement agreement under which Polygram Records, KISS's label, was instructed to pay Street Beat a 50% publisher share, including songwriter royalties, for mechanical royalties from record sales, but not to pay Vincent directly.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?