Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Spotlight : Review Entire Lease When Drafting an Extension

By William Crowe
March 01, 2004

Extensions of lease terms are fairly simple documents to draft and review, but a thorough review of the existing lease is required by both parties in order to produce a lease amendment that fairly reflects the business deal.

The obvious provisions are the extension of the lease term, the adjustments to rent, including, if applicable, any update of base years for real estate taxes and operating taxes, and any landlord work or allowance for tenant improvements. But there are other less readily apparent issues that may have to be dealt with. Because the underlying lease may contain various other provisions that are no longer germane, both parties must be careful to review the existing lease to exclude such provisions. In the absence of such exclusions, the catchall “except as modified hereby the Lease is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect” could inadvertently produce unwanted results. For example, rights of first refusal, first offer, expansion, renewal, and early termination are frequently not applicable to renewal terms, but in the absence of specific references in the lease amendment excluding the operation of such provisions, a landlord may unwittingly bind itself to providing the tenant with such continuing rights. Other provisions such as co-tenancy, continuous operation, and permitted uses may have been affected by the passage of time and should be reviewed carefully by both parties to determine whether any updates are needed. Perhaps the tenant's broker needs to be recognized in the extension.

There is a tendency in these situations for the parties to keep it simple, which is understandable, but keeping it simple does not obviate the need for a review of the entire lease prior to the execution of a “simple” amendment to make sure that simple is also thorough.



William Crowe

Extensions of lease terms are fairly simple documents to draft and review, but a thorough review of the existing lease is required by both parties in order to produce a lease amendment that fairly reflects the business deal.

The obvious provisions are the extension of the lease term, the adjustments to rent, including, if applicable, any update of base years for real estate taxes and operating taxes, and any landlord work or allowance for tenant improvements. But there are other less readily apparent issues that may have to be dealt with. Because the underlying lease may contain various other provisions that are no longer germane, both parties must be careful to review the existing lease to exclude such provisions. In the absence of such exclusions, the catchall “except as modified hereby the Lease is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect” could inadvertently produce unwanted results. For example, rights of first refusal, first offer, expansion, renewal, and early termination are frequently not applicable to renewal terms, but in the absence of specific references in the lease amendment excluding the operation of such provisions, a landlord may unwittingly bind itself to providing the tenant with such continuing rights. Other provisions such as co-tenancy, continuous operation, and permitted uses may have been affected by the passage of time and should be reviewed carefully by both parties to determine whether any updates are needed. Perhaps the tenant's broker needs to be recognized in the extension.

There is a tendency in these situations for the parties to keep it simple, which is understandable, but keeping it simple does not obviate the need for a review of the entire lease prior to the execution of a “simple” amendment to make sure that simple is also thorough.



William Crowe

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.