Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's commercial real estate market, with new shopping centers being developed at a rapid pace, landlords and tenants in existing older shopping centers have to work diligently to stay competitive. A factor that should be considered by both parties to stay competitive includes the eventual need to remodel and/or expand the shopping center.
This two-part article explores some of the issues that arise in negotiating a lease form that contains clauses defining the rights of the landlord and obligations of the tenant with regard to remodeling or expanding a shopping center. The first part of the article discusses negotiating points that could benefit, rather than burden, a landlord and tenant, during the administration of the lease. Part two will provide some suggested model language to consider when drafting a lease.
The need for both the landlord and the tenant to maintain a competitive shopping center (and competitive retail base) will arise in those instances in which the surrounding retail base has had a new increase in new shopping center development. A familiar scenario for remodeling may occur when a landlord owns a community shopping center anchored by a grocery store and drug store. At the time it was constructed, the center was considered on the outer edge of the population trade area. The population trade area increased year after year, and new shopping centers were developed in the same trade area to absorb the increased demand for retail goods and services. These new shopping centers incorporate and reflect current shopping center design standards relative to facility upgrades, layouts of inline buildings and outlot parcels, parking lots and access, landscaping, and trade name signs. The newer shopping centers are, therefore, more attractive and desirable to retail tenants and their customers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?