Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Realizing the sizable impact of revenues from Internet sales, key states such as New York and California now require taxpayers to declare any tax they owe on out-of-state purchases.
Though state revenue agencies similarly sought sales tax on mail-order items before the e-commerce boom of the late 1990s, Internet sales have “really shined a spotlight on it and increased the urgency,” says Harley Duncan, executive director of the Federation of Tax Administrators.
By law, residents are supposed to pay sales taxes to their states if they order books, clothing, computers and other items by mail or online from businesses based elsewhere.
“Nobody ' very few ' ever followed that rule,” says Anthony Leone, a certified public accountant in Buffalo.
The National Governors Association estimates state and local governments will lose at least $35 billion this year from Internet sales.
The new tax return line, New York state officials say, forces taxpayers to confront their liability or potentially face audits that could uncover credit card statements and mounting tax debt.
But it is unclear whether that threat is enough.
Dan DeVeronica, 21, who owns an Internet cafe in Rochester, says most New Yorkers, including himself, will likely leave “line 56″ blank “as sort of a protest.”
Though U.S. Supreme Court precedents side with the states, DeVeronica says he was outraged New York would try to collect. “The Internet is not a government service. It's privately owned so it shouldn't be taxable,” he reasons.
Officials from several states say they expect few, if any, tax returns to be audited – even if a taxpayer claims zero liability.
And so the revenues should keep trickling in.
New York tax officials are expecting the new tax line, for which they have added seven pages of instructions and tables, to yield just $2.5 million. Like New York, most states let taxpayers estimate their liability based on household income.
California projects its out-of-state sales line will bring in $13 million this year – out of an estimated $1.2 billion owed by individuals and businesses, says California Equalization Board spokesman Vic Anderson.
“That's always a problem, making people aware of this liability,” Anderson says. “It's one of the most misunderstood taxes out there.”
New York loses more than $1 billion in sales tax revenues from out-of-state purchases, according to a University of Tennessee study.
In Ohio, when the line was added to tax forms 4 years ago, 52,000 taxpayers participated. In 2002, the number dropped to 46,000, out of 5.7 million total returns, says Gary Gudmundson, a spokesman for the Ohio tax department. The state raises about $2 million, but projects that about $500 million goes uncollected.
States have tried other tactics, without any more success.
When Maine added the line in 1989, it also created a “default assessment” of 0.04% of adjusted gross income if the line was left blank. By 1998, the default was gone because of concerns the system wasn't fair for taxpayers who simply forgot or didn't know the rules, says Eileen Bemis, deputy director of the Maine Sales, Fuel and Special Tax Division.
Without the default, Maine generated $1.3 million from the line last year, but might be missing out on as much as $30 million a year, she says.
“It's pretty much an honor system in that it's very difficult to go back and audit someone's checkbook or credit card statements,” Bemis says.
Already, a New York lawmaker has introduced a bill to drop the line.
“We're going to make tax evaders out of law-abiding citizens and policemen out of tax preparers and accountants,” says Assemblyman Ronald Tocci, a Democrat in the chamber's majority. Who, he asks, “keeps tabs of what they buy on vacation in the Bahamas or Canada? Or anyplace? It's crazy. It's insane.”
Forty-five states require buyers to pay sales taxes on Internet and other out-of-state purchases, though a few, including California and Minnesota, exempt the first few hundred dollars and focus on high-ticket items.
Meanwhile, a number of major retailers including Wal-Mart, Toys “R” Us and Target voluntarily collect state taxes. And some states are working on a “streamlined sales tax project” that would tax online purchases at the point of sale. Congress would have to enact a law, however, to make such a system nationwide.
States with sales tax lines on their tax forms include Alabama, California, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin, according to the Federation of Tax Administrators.
Georgia, Hawaii and the District of Columbia have separate forms in their income tax packages.
Wire service reports contributed to this article
Realizing the sizable impact of revenues from Internet sales, key states such as
Though state revenue agencies similarly sought sales tax on mail-order items before the e-commerce boom of the late 1990s, Internet sales have “really shined a spotlight on it and increased the urgency,” says Harley Duncan, executive director of the Federation of Tax Administrators.
By law, residents are supposed to pay sales taxes to their states if they order books, clothing, computers and other items by mail or online from businesses based elsewhere.
“Nobody ' very few ' ever followed that rule,” says Anthony Leone, a certified public accountant in Buffalo.
The National Governors Association estimates state and local governments will lose at least $35 billion this year from Internet sales.
The new tax return line,
But it is unclear whether that threat is enough.
Dan DeVeronica, 21, who owns an Internet cafe in Rochester, says most New Yorkers, including himself, will likely leave “line 56″ blank “as sort of a protest.”
Though U.S. Supreme Court precedents side with the states, DeVeronica says he was outraged
Officials from several states say they expect few, if any, tax returns to be audited – even if a taxpayer claims zero liability.
And so the revenues should keep trickling in.
California projects its out-of-state sales line will bring in $13 million this year – out of an estimated $1.2 billion owed by individuals and businesses, says California Equalization Board spokesman Vic Anderson.
“That's always a problem, making people aware of this liability,” Anderson says. “It's one of the most misunderstood taxes out there.”
In Ohio, when the line was added to tax forms 4 years ago, 52,000 taxpayers participated. In 2002, the number dropped to 46,000, out of 5.7 million total returns, says Gary Gudmundson, a spokesman for the Ohio tax department. The state raises about $2 million, but projects that about $500 million goes uncollected.
States have tried other tactics, without any more success.
When Maine added the line in 1989, it also created a “default assessment” of 0.04% of adjusted gross income if the line was left blank. By 1998, the default was gone because of concerns the system wasn't fair for taxpayers who simply forgot or didn't know the rules, says Eileen Bemis, deputy director of the Maine Sales, Fuel and Special Tax Division.
Without the default, Maine generated $1.3 million from the line last year, but might be missing out on as much as $30 million a year, she says.
“It's pretty much an honor system in that it's very difficult to go back and audit someone's checkbook or credit card statements,” Bemis says.
Already, a
“We're going to make tax evaders out of law-abiding citizens and policemen out of tax preparers and accountants,” says Assemblyman Ronald Tocci, a Democrat in the chamber's majority. Who, he asks, “keeps tabs of what they buy on vacation in the Bahamas or Canada? Or anyplace? It's crazy. It's insane.”
Forty-five states require buyers to pay sales taxes on Internet and other out-of-state purchases, though a few, including California and Minnesota, exempt the first few hundred dollars and focus on high-ticket items.
Meanwhile, a number of major retailers including
States with sales tax lines on their tax forms include Alabama, California, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
Georgia, Hawaii and the District of Columbia have separate forms in their income tax packages.
Wire service reports contributed to this article
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.