Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Internal Control Reports: The Next New Thing
Many public companies have already begun to prepare for compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act). Management and directors may not be clear on the framework for Section 404. Although Section 404 does not require disclosure in Annual Reports for the calendar year-end 2003, requisite lead times suggest that by now companies must be working diligently on compliance planning.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued final Section 404 rules on June 5, 2003. The rules require each public company's Annual Report to contain an internal control report:
- Stating management's responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting; and
- Containing an assessment as of the end of the fiscal year of the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting.
These rules apply to all companies regardless of size. Under the new compliance schedule, a company that is an “accelerated filer” as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 (generally, a U.S. company that has equity market capitalization over $75 million and has filed at least one annual report with the Commission), must begin to comply with these amendments for its first fiscal year ending on or after Nov. 15, 2004 (originally June 15, 2004). A non-accelerated filer must begin to comply with these requirements for its first fiscal year ending on or after July 15, 2005 (originally April 15, 2005). The Commission similarly has extended the compliance date for related requirements regarding evaluation of internal control over financial reporting and management certification requirements, including certification and related requirements applicable to registered investment companies. Even for non-accelerated filers, prompt action is important, since many will have less well-developed internal controls and thus may need more time to implement improvements.
Management's Report
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
The Benefits of Blockchain for e-Discovery and Data Preservation
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.