Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Attorney Fees Update

By Stan Soocher
April 01, 2004

Copyright Fair Use; Sec. 505

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a follow-up decision to its recent ruling awarding attorney fees and costs to media defendants that won a suit over use of film clips of actor Robert Mitchum in news obituaries. Video-Cinema Films Inc. v. CBS Corp., 98-7130. The court had asked CBS to provide an estimate of the actual imputed costs of using in-house counsel to defend CBS. In the latest fee decision, the district court accepted $154.99 as a reasonable hourly rate, based on in-house counsel's education and experience. The court multiplied that rate by 70.1 hours for a total of $10,864.80 in attorney fees. The court then granted an award for in-house counsel work for which CBS kept no contemporaneous records. The court agreed that the network would otherwise be “undercompensated for the reasonable value of its work.” But, as it had done with the ABC network in its previous fee ruling, the court reduced CBS's request 25%, from $50,000 to $37,500 for failure to keep sufficient contemporaneous records.

Copyright Fair Use; Sec. 505

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a follow-up decision to its recent ruling awarding attorney fees and costs to media defendants that won a suit over use of film clips of actor Robert Mitchum in news obituaries. Video-Cinema Films Inc. v. CBS Corp., 98-7130. The court had asked CBS to provide an estimate of the actual imputed costs of using in-house counsel to defend CBS. In the latest fee decision, the district court accepted $154.99 as a reasonable hourly rate, based on in-house counsel's education and experience. The court multiplied that rate by 70.1 hours for a total of $10,864.80 in attorney fees. The court then granted an award for in-house counsel work for which CBS kept no contemporaneous records. The court agreed that the network would otherwise be “undercompensated for the reasonable value of its work.” But, as it had done with the ABC network in its previous fee ruling, the court reduced CBS's request 25%, from $50,000 to $37,500 for failure to keep sufficient contemporaneous records.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.