Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FCC to Regulate Some Voice Over IP
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently took three significant actions in the regulation of voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services. On February 12, the agency issued a notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on issues related to providing VoIP. That day, the FCC also ruled that the VoIP service offered by a company that provided the service entirely over the Internet, without interface with the traditional telephone system, is exempt from such regulation. The agency also expressed its intent to initiate a proceeding under the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) to address technical issues associated with law-enforcement access to IP-enabled services such as VoIP. In a related development, the California Public Utilities Commission unanimously voted to assume jurisdiction over any VoIP call that connects with traditional telephone networks. For more, see an FCC press release concerning the matter at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243869A1.pdf.
On February 8, the United States and Australia concluded a free-trade agreement containing intellectual-property provisions. The provisions include a requirement that Australia extend its existing term of protection for intellectual property rights such as copyrights, patents, trademarks and trade secrets. The agreement also requires the adoption of “state-of-the-art protection for digital products,” such as increased criminal and civil protection against unauthorized decoding of satellite television signals, and tighter controls on circumventing technological protection of copyrighted material.
FCC to Regulate Some Voice Over IP
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently took three significant actions in the regulation of voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services. On February 12, the agency issued a notice of proposed rulemaking seeking public comment on issues related to providing VoIP. That day, the FCC also ruled that the VoIP service offered by a company that provided the service entirely over the Internet, without interface with the traditional telephone system, is exempt from such regulation. The agency also expressed its intent to initiate a proceeding under the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) to address technical issues associated with law-enforcement access to IP-enabled services such as VoIP. In a related development, the California Public Utilities Commission unanimously voted to assume jurisdiction over any VoIP call that connects with traditional telephone networks. For more, see an FCC press release concerning the matter at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243869A1.pdf.
On February 8, the United States and Australia concluded a free-trade agreement containing intellectual-property provisions. The provisions include a requirement that Australia extend its existing term of protection for intellectual property rights such as copyrights, patents, trademarks and trade secrets. The agreement also requires the adoption of “state-of-the-art protection for digital products,” such as increased criminal and civil protection against unauthorized decoding of satellite television signals, and tighter controls on circumventing technological protection of copyrighted material.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.