Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most employers have come to realize that personal use of the Internet at work by employees can decrease productivity, and that employees downloading inappropriate material can lead to hostile work environment claims. What many employers have not yet thought about is the potentially explosive problems facing them as the music industry continues its crackdown on those who illegally download and share pirated music files over the Internet.
Downloading music has become as common, and as easy, as circulating cartoons via e-mail. It, too, can be done with a few clicks of a mouse, with relatively little thought and with no expense to the person doing the downloading. The cost to the employer, however, can be great. Online piracy ' which can consist of the unauthorized uploading of copyrighted sound recordings or graphics that are then made available to the public at large, or the downloading of sound recordings or graphics from an Internet site even if the recordings are not for resale ' is considered a form of copyright infringement.
The music industry has taken a tough stance, recently filing copyright infringement suits against more than 500 individuals in just one day in February 2004. While, up until now, the industry has been targeting teens and their parents, it is only a matter of time until it begins filing actions against the employers whose employees are downloading at work – using the employer's computers and systems to make unauthorized copies of music or other media files. Indeed, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has already sent letters to thousands of companies, notifying them that their employees are using their computer systems to illegally swap music files. Lawsuits are, undoubtedly, the next step.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?