Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson announced on Feb. 26 that a task force had been created to advise and assist HHS in determining whether and how drug importation into the United States could be conducted safely. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) directed the HHS to lead a comprehensive study to be completed by December 2004, gauging both the positive and negative effects that can be expected on the health of American patients, on medical costs and on the development of new medicines if pharmaceutical products are imported into the United States from countries with lower drug prices.
In the MMA, Congress directed HHS to address, among other things, the current limitations on the ability to certify the safety of imported drugs, the vulnerabilities in pharmaceutical distribution chains that could compromise safety, the availability of anti-counterfeiting technologies and their costs, and the willingness of foreign countries to help ensure the drugs shipped to the United States are safe, genuine and meet FDA standards.
In addition, HHS was asked to assess the long-term effects of drug imports on drug prices and on research and development efforts, aspects of the drug import debate that have largely been ignored by consumers who want lower-cost drugs now. The question is, if U.S. consumers are now footing much of the bill for these costs, who will take up the slack if they start buying from countries that have negotiated better deals for their own citizens? It may be true that some of these other countries are getting a free ride, but if Americans stop paying too, something has surely got to give.
The choice of FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan to head the team sparked immediate controversy. Although the new Task Force on Drug Importation is slated to solicit information from a broad spectrum of supporters and opponents to drug importation – from pharmaceutical manufacturers to drug product consumers – the choice of FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan to head the group has raised cries of foul from many of those in favor of imports. As the head of the FDA, McClellan has made no secret of the fact that he is adamantly opposed to importing drugs, even from countries with relatively safe drug supplies, like Canada. In fact, McClellan reluctantly appeared before Congress in mid-March after repeatedly being asked (and just as often declining) to testify concerning his stance on drug imports. He finally agreed to speak to Congressional members because his historical position on the issue was holding up his confirmation as President Bush's choice to head the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
In order to gather and discuss information from all relevant stakeholders, HHS has announced that the task force will convene five meetings, one each with representatives from the following groups: consumer groups; professional health care groups; health care purchasers, including representatives of cities and states; industry associations; and international stakeholders. There will also be a meeting April 14, announced in the Federal Register of March 18 (see http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/04-6145.htm), at which the general public is invited to provide comments.
Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson announced on Feb. 26 that a task force had been created to advise and assist HHS in determining whether and how drug importation into the United States could be conducted safely. The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) directed the HHS to lead a comprehensive study to be completed by December 2004, gauging both the positive and negative effects that can be expected on the health of American patients, on medical costs and on the development of new medicines if pharmaceutical products are imported into the United States from countries with lower drug prices.
In the MMA, Congress directed HHS to address, among other things, the current limitations on the ability to certify the safety of imported drugs, the vulnerabilities in pharmaceutical distribution chains that could compromise safety, the availability of anti-counterfeiting technologies and their costs, and the willingness of foreign countries to help ensure the drugs shipped to the United States are safe, genuine and meet FDA standards.
In addition, HHS was asked to assess the long-term effects of drug imports on drug prices and on research and development efforts, aspects of the drug import debate that have largely been ignored by consumers who want lower-cost drugs now. The question is, if U.S. consumers are now footing much of the bill for these costs, who will take up the slack if they start buying from countries that have negotiated better deals for their own citizens? It may be true that some of these other countries are getting a free ride, but if Americans stop paying too, something has surely got to give.
The choice of FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan to head the team sparked immediate controversy. Although the new Task Force on Drug Importation is slated to solicit information from a broad spectrum of supporters and opponents to drug importation – from pharmaceutical manufacturers to drug product consumers – the choice of FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan to head the group has raised cries of foul from many of those in favor of imports. As the head of the FDA, McClellan has made no secret of the fact that he is adamantly opposed to importing drugs, even from countries with relatively safe drug supplies, like Canada. In fact, McClellan reluctantly appeared before Congress in mid-March after repeatedly being asked (and just as often declining) to testify concerning his stance on drug imports. He finally agreed to speak to Congressional members because his historical position on the issue was holding up his confirmation as President Bush's choice to head the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
In order to gather and discuss information from all relevant stakeholders, HHS has announced that the task force will convene five meetings, one each with representatives from the following groups: consumer groups; professional health care groups; health care purchasers, including representatives of cities and states; industry associations; and international stakeholders. There will also be a meeting April 14, announced in the Federal Register of March 18 (see http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/04-6145.htm), at which the general public is invited to provide comments.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.