Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Local Civil Rules for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York regarding motions for Reconsideration or Re-argument, and Statements of Material Facts on Motions for Summary Judgment, have been amended effective March 26, 2004.
Local Civil Rule 6.3 — Motions for Reconsideration or Re-argument, has been amended to clarify that the time to serve such a motion runs from the date of the entry of the court's order determining the original motion, or, in the case of a judgment, from the date of the entry of the judgment.
Local Civil Rule 56.1 — Statements of Material Facts on Motion for Summary Judgment, has been amended to clarify the numbering of paragraphs and requirements for citations to the record, particularly in opposition papers. The amended Rule 56.1 provides that opposition papers must include “a correspondingly numbered paragraph responding to each numbered paragraph in the statement of the moving party, and if necessary, additional paragraphs containing a separate, short and concise statement of additional material facts … ” LR 56.1(b). The amended Rule 56.1 also provides that each statement “ by the movant or opponent pursuant to Rule 56.1(a) and (b), including each statement controverting any statement of material fact,” must be followed by a citation to admissible evidence. LR 56.1(d).
The Local Civil Rules for the Southern and Eastern Districts of
Local Civil Rule 6.3 — Motions for Reconsideration or Re-argument, has been amended to clarify that the time to serve such a motion runs from the date of the entry of the court's order determining the original motion, or, in the case of a judgment, from the date of the entry of the judgment.
Local Civil Rule 56.1 — Statements of Material Facts on Motion for Summary Judgment, has been amended to clarify the numbering of paragraphs and requirements for citations to the record, particularly in opposition papers. The amended Rule 56.1 provides that opposition papers must include “a correspondingly numbered paragraph responding to each numbered paragraph in the statement of the moving party, and if necessary, additional paragraphs containing a separate, short and concise statement of additional material facts … ” LR 56.1(b). The amended Rule 56.1 also provides that each statement “ by the movant or opponent pursuant to Rule 56.1(a) and (b), including each statement controverting any statement of material fact,” must be followed by a citation to admissible evidence. LR 56.1(d).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.