Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Spotlight: Addressing the Dilemma of Tenant Parking

By William Crowe
April 23, 2004

Dedicated parking spaces appurtenant to office leases, especially covered spaces, are a prized commodity, particularly in suburban markets where virtually all of a tenant's employees drive to work. A tenant may be able to negotiate an arrangement where it receives more parking passes than the actual number of cars it is permitted to park at the premises at any given time under the theory that not all employees with a parking pass will actually show up for work on any given day. The problem presented by this approach is, of course, the one day when every driver with a parking pass shows up for work and there is no room for all of their cars.

One creative way to get around this problem may be to negotiate an arrangement where a tenant is given more parking passes than its allotment of parking spaces, but required to park any excess vehicles in tandem spaces. Most commuters (and, by extension, tenant real estate representatives who have to listen to the complaints) despise tandem parking spaces because of their lack of convenience and flexibility. Landlords are generally not particularly enamored of the tandem spaces either, given the hassle involved with enforcing tandem parking rules and the tight lot/garage layouts required for tandem spaces. In this situation, one solution is to allot a dedicated tandem parking area for the tenant's overflow parkers that the tenant is required to police. This allows the tenant the flexibility of dealing with its overflow parking, including possibilities such as valet parking and/or assigning the less desirable spaces to designated employees, and frees the landlord from the hassle of dealing with the logistics of tandem parking. It also allows the landlord to offer more parking options to attract potential tenants than the traditional X number of spaces per rentable square foot method.



William Crowe

Dedicated parking spaces appurtenant to office leases, especially covered spaces, are a prized commodity, particularly in suburban markets where virtually all of a tenant's employees drive to work. A tenant may be able to negotiate an arrangement where it receives more parking passes than the actual number of cars it is permitted to park at the premises at any given time under the theory that not all employees with a parking pass will actually show up for work on any given day. The problem presented by this approach is, of course, the one day when every driver with a parking pass shows up for work and there is no room for all of their cars.

One creative way to get around this problem may be to negotiate an arrangement where a tenant is given more parking passes than its allotment of parking spaces, but required to park any excess vehicles in tandem spaces. Most commuters (and, by extension, tenant real estate representatives who have to listen to the complaints) despise tandem parking spaces because of their lack of convenience and flexibility. Landlords are generally not particularly enamored of the tandem spaces either, given the hassle involved with enforcing tandem parking rules and the tight lot/garage layouts required for tandem spaces. In this situation, one solution is to allot a dedicated tandem parking area for the tenant's overflow parkers that the tenant is required to police. This allows the tenant the flexibility of dealing with its overflow parking, including possibilities such as valet parking and/or assigning the less desirable spaces to designated employees, and frees the landlord from the hassle of dealing with the logistics of tandem parking. It also allows the landlord to offer more parking options to attract potential tenants than the traditional X number of spaces per rentable square foot method.



William Crowe

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.