Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Selecting an e-Discovery Provider That Meets Your Needs
The potential size of today's data sets, the ease with which electronic files can be altered and the complexity of these projects in general makes selecting the right e-discovery provider a high-stakes game.
Here's the kind of negative exposure that counsel risk by outsourcing an electronic-discovery (e-discovery) project to the wrong service provider:
- Missed deadlines;
- Out-of-control costs;
- Incomplete or inaccurate work product (or both);
- The wrong solution for the job at hand; and
- Spoliation and adverse-inference claims.
The Need to Know, And to Check
This year has seen a continuing proliferation of companies claiming to offer state-of-the-art e-discovery services in response to rising volume and variety of e-discovery needs. It is dangerous to assume that all these companies were created, and have remained, equal. Companies come to the bargaining and working table with vastly different levels of experience and capability, from those possessing significant knowledge and experience to those that have simply recognized a growing potential market on which they want to cash in.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?