The first line of defense in most copyright infringement actions revolves around the question of “access” ' namely, whether the defendant had a reasonable possibility of viewing or hearing the plaintiff's work such that the defendant could have copied it illegally.
Bare Corporate Receipt Doctrine Less Help to Copyright Plaintiffs
The first line of defense in most copyright infringement actions revolves around the question of "access" ' namely, whether the defendant had a reasonable possibility of viewing or hearing the plaintiff's work such that the defendant could have copied it illegally. Absent some direct proof that the defendant actually copied the plaintiff's work ' evidence that typically is not present ' a plaintiff will attempt to prove such copying indirectly by establishing that a defendant had access to the plaintiff's work and that the defendant's work is "substantially similar" to the plaintiff's. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has made it more difficult for plaintiffs to prove access. <BR/>Specifically, in the Second Circuit's view, a company's "bare corporate receipt" of a plaintiff's work is insufficient proof of access.
By
Orin SnyderThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
