Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CASE CAPTION: CTB Film Company Ltd. v. Michael Biehn, L.A. Superior Court # BC314452.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Breach of written contract.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: The plaintiff is a successful film company based in Russia. It is producing a film entitled “The American.” Defendant Biehn agreed to play the lead role. Principal photography began in New York in early November 2003 and Biehn was fine. He then traveled to Russia for further shooting on Nov. 11. The next day, the second day of shooting there, he appeared on the set “reeking of alcohol and obviously intoxicated” and verbally abused the crew. Over the next several days, Biehn's speech was slurred and erratic and he had trouble walking. At times, he carried a Pepsi bottle filled with vodka. His acting performance was unacceptable and he made sexual advances to some employees on the film. One actor refused to work with him because he was afraid of him. To deal with Biehn's deteriorating appearance, CTB eliminated close-ups of him and many scenes became useless because Biehn was not familiar with the script. Production was eventually suspended when Biehn agreed to check into a hospital where he was diagnosed with acute alcoholic intoxication. Production was stopped on Nov. 18, 2003.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?