Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Business Crimes Hotline
MASSACHUSETTS
Tugboat Operator to Plead Guilty and Pay $10 Million for 2003 Buzzard Bay Oil Spill
Bouchard Transportation Company (BTC) has agreed to plead guilty to one count of violating the Clean Water Act and one count of violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act for the April 2003 oil spill in Buzzards Bay. The Clean Water Act charge stems from the negligent discharge of thousands of gallons of oil. The plea agreement will require BTC to pay a fine of $10 million, implement remedial measures to prevent future oil spills, and BTC will be placed on probation for a period of 3 years.
According to the information, the Buzzards Bay oil spill occurred when a BTC tugboat towing a barge containing over 4 million gallons of oil veered off course through a buoy-marked channel. The tugboat and barge then struck a series of rocks, which ripped a 12-foot hole in the bottom of the barge, rupturing one of its oil tanks. The tugboat's Mate allegedly had left the wheelhouse to work on the stern of the boat and so missed attempted communications by another vessel to warn him that the tugboat was off course. BTC allegedly had received complaints about the Mate's competence on previous occasions, including by other captains who had questioned whether the Mate was qualified to be at the helm of a tugboat that towing a barge loaded with oil.
If the plea agreement is approved, BTC will be required to pay $9 million of the fine at the time of sentencing. Seven million dollars of the proceeds will go to the North American Wetlands Conservation Fund, and the other $2 million will go to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which is administered by the U.S. Coast Guard to pay clean up costs and damages claims for oil spills. The remaining $1 million of the fine will be suspended unless BTC fails to comply with the conditions of probation, which include hiring an experienced tugboat pilot and placing a crew member inside the wheelhouse at all times.
Ellen E. Oberwetter Esq.,
Tugboat Operator to Plead Guilty and Pay $10 Million for 2003 Buzzard Bay Oil Spill
Bouchard Transportation Company (BTC) has agreed to plead guilty to one count of violating the Clean Water Act and one count of violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act for the April 2003 oil spill in Buzzards Bay. The Clean Water Act charge stems from the negligent discharge of thousands of gallons of oil. The plea agreement will require BTC to pay a fine of $10 million, implement remedial measures to prevent future oil spills, and BTC will be placed on probation for a period of 3 years.
According to the information, the Buzzards Bay oil spill occurred when a BTC tugboat towing a barge containing over 4 million gallons of oil veered off course through a buoy-marked channel. The tugboat and barge then struck a series of rocks, which ripped a 12-foot hole in the bottom of the barge, rupturing one of its oil tanks. The tugboat's Mate allegedly had left the wheelhouse to work on the stern of the boat and so missed attempted communications by another vessel to warn him that the tugboat was off course. BTC allegedly had received complaints about the Mate's competence on previous occasions, including by other captains who had questioned whether the Mate was qualified to be at the helm of a tugboat that towing a barge loaded with oil.
If the plea agreement is approved, BTC will be required to pay $9 million of the fine at the time of sentencing. Seven million dollars of the proceeds will go to the North American Wetlands Conservation Fund, and the other $2 million will go to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which is administered by the U.S. Coast Guard to pay clean up costs and damages claims for oil spills. The remaining $1 million of the fine will be suspended unless BTC fails to comply with the conditions of probation, which include hiring an experienced tugboat pilot and placing a crew member inside the wheelhouse at all times.
Ellen E. Oberwetter Esq.,
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.