Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Tort Liability of Out-of-Possession Landlords

By Stewart E. Sterk
May 24, 2004

Ingargiola v. Waheguru Management, Inc., decided recently by the Second Department (see infra at p. 5), revisited a question that has long engendered confusion in the New York courts: What liability does a landlord bear for personal injuries suffered in leased premises? Ingargiola also presented a related question: What steps can a landlord take to reduce exposure for any liability the landlord would otherwise bear? This article explores those issues.

Statutorily Imposed Obligations

When a state statute or local law imposes a non-delegable duty on a landlord, that landlord bears liability to parties injured as a result of breach of that duty. Multiple Dwelling Law Section 78 provides the prime example. The statute provides that “every multiple dwelling … shall be kept in good repair” and makes the owner responsible for compliance with the section. The Court of Appeals has held that a landlord of a residential building remains liable for injuries caused by defective conditions, even if the landlord had no actual knowledge of those conditions. Thus, in Tkach v. Montefiore Hospital, 289 NY 387, the hospital had leased an entire apartment building to Hurwitz, and by the terms of the lease, required Hurwitz to maintain the building in good repair. Nevertheless, when two apartment tenants were injured by falling plaster, the court held the landlord liable, even if he could establish actual ignorance of the defective condition. And in Worth v. Latham, 59 NY2d 231, the court held that the landlord's liability under MDL section 78 extended even to commercial tenants, so long as the building also contained residential units and the injury was caused by a structural problem applicable to residential and commercial tenants alike. In that case, the injuries were caused by a widening crack in a weight-bearing wall.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.