Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Attorney Fees Update
Right of Publicity/Declaratory Actions
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided that a federal declaratory action for a determination of rights to the likeness of Albert Einstein was brought “under” the Astaire Celebrity Image Protection Act, Calif. Civ. Code Sec. 3344.1 for purposes of awarding attorney fees to the prevailing party. Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) v. Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJ), 03-15270. EA filed a declaratory suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California seeking a ruling that its use of Einstein's likeness in “Command & Conquer” video games didn't infringe on HUJ's post-mortem publicity rights. The district court denied EA's attorney fees request. Reversing in an unpublished opinion, the appeals court noted that Sec. 3344.1 is similar to the Copyright Act in that 17 U.S.C. Sec. 505 allows for a discretionary award of attorneys' fees to the “prevailing party” in “any civil action under it.” The appeals court concluded that “an action brought to declare the rights and responsibilities of affected parties under Sec. 3344.1 is brought under the statute regardless whether the suit is filed by the person who allegedly violated the statute or the injured party.” The appeals court then remanded the case for the district court to determine whether EA was the “prevailing party.”
Right of Publicity/Declaratory Actions
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?