Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Large law firms usually have in-house administrators ensuring their systems operate as they should. Small firms and solo practitioners, on the other hand, often lack this luxury and consequently are not as efficiently organized as their larger counterparts. The need for administrative support within small firms becomes apparent when one realizes that most attorneys dread administrative tasks. They rightly determine that the best use of their time is through the performance of billable client services.
Vicious Cycles
Since administration erodes billable time, attorneys delegate administrative duties to their often-overworked secretaries, who in turn add it to their own to-do lists. These duties are then postponed until “free time” is available, resulting in outdated, unreliable, and possibly meaningless work-in-process, accounts receivable, cash and general ledger balances. Factor in the use of unrelated software applications, and the office could be in a state of workable disorganization. The direct costs associated with this disorganization ' lost time, inefficient billings or collections, and additional administrative personnel needed to perform redundant tasks – can easily accumulate into tens of thousands of dollars per year. A quick calculation of one lost billable hour per week (at an average billable rate of $150/hr), alone yields over $7500 of lost income per year.
Firm administration generally addresses the routine and timely operation of the firm in areas such as recording and billing client work in process, applying client receipts against outstanding invoices, processing client costs and accounts payable, follow-up and collection of delinquent account receivables, maintaining and coordinating current versions of operating systems and application software, and backing up and securely storing copies of the firms data. Administration properly performed, regardless of the size of the firm, results in the efficient conversion of services rendered to cash received, accurate cash, accounts receivable, and work-in-process balances, and meaningful management reporting.
Breaking the Cycle
Within the small firm, the most important aspect of law firm administration is the correct use of law practice management software as well as an understanding of what type of administrative tasks you want to perform versus which ones you may consider outsourcing to a qualified third party. Ideally, you should use a seamlessly integrated application, allowing a transaction to be entered once then posted throughout as needed.
Let's take a look at a simple, real world example of inefficient administration: The attorney or secretary manually records a calendar transaction. Once the calendared transaction is completed, the attorney records this transaction on a paper time sheet. It may be missing required information, such as the client or matter code, which is then passed along to the secretary for completion. Thereafter, the completed transactions are batched together and entered into a computerized billing system. After processing, the attorney needs to review the entered transaction to ensure that it was posted to the correct client and matter without spelling errors. In this example, the same time transaction was processed five times ' the recording of the initial calendar transaction, re-recording the completed calendared transaction by the attorney on a manual time sheet, completion and review of this time by the secretary, processing by the billing clerk, and lastly the final review by the attorney.
The correct use of software applied toward the processing of this transaction would involve the following: The attorney or the secretary enters the original calendar transaction into the system. Once the calendared transaction's services are rendered, the attorney simply acknowledges the completion and the transaction is then automatically transferred to the clients work-in-process account for future invoicing. The attorney has eliminated multiple individuals processing the same transaction and streamlined the review process by maintaining control over the assignment of the appropriate client and matter codes as well as for the spelling of the individuals' names.
The same holds true within other areas, such as the processing of client receipts. Attorneys must complete the process as it is occurs, rather than perform piecemeal functions over time. To correctly process receipts, they must be completely posted through the system before being sent to the bank. As the deposit ticket is being prepared, the receipts should be applied against the outstanding invoices and recorded within the general ledger. Use of an integrated system will eliminate redundant tasks and transposition errors often associated with multiple standalone systems.
Disbursement checks must be handled similarly. Manual checks should never be prepared since they are often not recorded. Use of an integrated system will automatically print the check, post client costs to the clients work-in-process account, decrease the firm's cash balance, record the expense in the general ledger, and add the check to the bank reconciliation program.
Correct use of the firm's existing law practice management application itself can easily save the attorney several hours of non-billable administrative time per week by directly decreasing the attorney's non-billable time or eliminating tasks delegated to administrative staff.
The Internet
Internet processing allows small firms to perform administrative tasks from anywhere, at any time, without installing additional communication software or requiring your office computer to remain operational when you're not on the premises. The attorney can maintain his or her calendar and perform administrative tasks while in the office, but are no longer tied to that specific computer. If it's more convenient, you have complete access and can perform all desired tasks from home or on the road.
Web Advantages
The efficient performance of firm administration often determines the profitability and productivity of your practice. When performed correctly, firm administration requires very little time ' allowing the lawyer to redirect the resources of the firm to billable client services, professional development, or the development of new business. When properly implemented, it's possible for a small firm to recapture 5-10 hours of previously non-billable time per week, potentially translating into tens of thousands of dollars per year. Taking advantage of Internet processing capabilities offers great advantages to the attorney that were unavailable just a couple of years ago.
Large law firms usually have in-house administrators ensuring their systems operate as they should. Small firms and solo practitioners, on the other hand, often lack this luxury and consequently are not as efficiently organized as their larger counterparts. The need for administrative support within small firms becomes apparent when one realizes that most attorneys dread administrative tasks. They rightly determine that the best use of their time is through the performance of billable client services.
Vicious Cycles
Since administration erodes billable time, attorneys delegate administrative duties to their often-overworked secretaries, who in turn add it to their own to-do lists. These duties are then postponed until “free time” is available, resulting in outdated, unreliable, and possibly meaningless work-in-process, accounts receivable, cash and general ledger balances. Factor in the use of unrelated software applications, and the office could be in a state of workable disorganization. The direct costs associated with this disorganization ' lost time, inefficient billings or collections, and additional administrative personnel needed to perform redundant tasks – can easily accumulate into tens of thousands of dollars per year. A quick calculation of one lost billable hour per week (at an average billable rate of $150/hr), alone yields over $7500 of lost income per year.
Firm administration generally addresses the routine and timely operation of the firm in areas such as recording and billing client work in process, applying client receipts against outstanding invoices, processing client costs and accounts payable, follow-up and collection of delinquent account receivables, maintaining and coordinating current versions of operating systems and application software, and backing up and securely storing copies of the firms data. Administration properly performed, regardless of the size of the firm, results in the efficient conversion of services rendered to cash received, accurate cash, accounts receivable, and work-in-process balances, and meaningful management reporting.
Breaking the Cycle
Within the small firm, the most important aspect of law firm administration is the correct use of law practice management software as well as an understanding of what type of administrative tasks you want to perform versus which ones you may consider outsourcing to a qualified third party. Ideally, you should use a seamlessly integrated application, allowing a transaction to be entered once then posted throughout as needed.
Let's take a look at a simple, real world example of inefficient administration: The attorney or secretary manually records a calendar transaction. Once the calendared transaction is completed, the attorney records this transaction on a paper time sheet. It may be missing required information, such as the client or matter code, which is then passed along to the secretary for completion. Thereafter, the completed transactions are batched together and entered into a computerized billing system. After processing, the attorney needs to review the entered transaction to ensure that it was posted to the correct client and matter without spelling errors. In this example, the same time transaction was processed five times ' the recording of the initial calendar transaction, re-recording the completed calendared transaction by the attorney on a manual time sheet, completion and review of this time by the secretary, processing by the billing clerk, and lastly the final review by the attorney.
The correct use of software applied toward the processing of this transaction would involve the following: The attorney or the secretary enters the original calendar transaction into the system. Once the calendared transaction's services are rendered, the attorney simply acknowledges the completion and the transaction is then automatically transferred to the clients work-in-process account for future invoicing. The attorney has eliminated multiple individuals processing the same transaction and streamlined the review process by maintaining control over the assignment of the appropriate client and matter codes as well as for the spelling of the individuals' names.
The same holds true within other areas, such as the processing of client receipts. Attorneys must complete the process as it is occurs, rather than perform piecemeal functions over time. To correctly process receipts, they must be completely posted through the system before being sent to the bank. As the deposit ticket is being prepared, the receipts should be applied against the outstanding invoices and recorded within the general ledger. Use of an integrated system will eliminate redundant tasks and transposition errors often associated with multiple standalone systems.
Disbursement checks must be handled similarly. Manual checks should never be prepared since they are often not recorded. Use of an integrated system will automatically print the check, post client costs to the clients work-in-process account, decrease the firm's cash balance, record the expense in the general ledger, and add the check to the bank reconciliation program.
Correct use of the firm's existing law practice management application itself can easily save the attorney several hours of non-billable administrative time per week by directly decreasing the attorney's non-billable time or eliminating tasks delegated to administrative staff.
The Internet
Internet processing allows small firms to perform administrative tasks from anywhere, at any time, without installing additional communication software or requiring your office computer to remain operational when you're not on the premises. The attorney can maintain his or her calendar and perform administrative tasks while in the office, but are no longer tied to that specific computer. If it's more convenient, you have complete access and can perform all desired tasks from home or on the road.
Web Advantages
The efficient performance of firm administration often determines the profitability and productivity of your practice. When performed correctly, firm administration requires very little time ' allowing the lawyer to redirect the resources of the firm to billable client services, professional development, or the development of new business. When properly implemented, it's possible for a small firm to recapture 5-10 hours of previously non-billable time per week, potentially translating into tens of thousands of dollars per year. Taking advantage of Internet processing capabilities offers great advantages to the attorney that were unavailable just a couple of years ago.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?