Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Developments of Note
CAN-SPAM Update
The U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, in cooperation with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), instituted the first criminal action under the federal CAN-SPAM Act. U.S. v. Lin, et al., No. 04-80383 (E.D. Mich. complaint filed April 28, 2004). Four individual defendants were arrested and charged with violations of the act and other federal laws based on the falsification of e-mail header information in an e-mail marketing scheme that involved false representations concerning diet products. The defendants are also named in a civil suit the FTC filed under CAN-SPAM. FTC v. Phoenix Avatar et al., FTC File No. 042-3084, Civil Action No. 04C 2897 (N.D. Ill. complaint filed April 28, 2004). The court in the Phoenix Avatar case issued a preliminary injunction against the spamming and froze the defendants' assets.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.